1967 McLaren M1C vs. 2010 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2010 Toyota Camry is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 McLaren M1C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 McLaren M1C would be higher. At 5,818 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 McLaren M1C is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 McLaren M1C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 McLaren M1C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Toyota Camry has automatic transmission and 1967 McLaren M1C has manual transmission. 1967 McLaren M1C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Toyota Camry will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 McLaren M1C | 2010 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | McLaren | Toyota |
| Model | M1C | Camry |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 5818 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
