1967 McLaren M1C vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 McLaren M1C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 McLaren M1C would be higher. At 5,818 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 McLaren M1C is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 McLaren M1C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 McLaren M1C | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | McLaren | Jeep |
| Model | M1C | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 5818 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
