1967 Mercury Brougham vs. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier

To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Brougham would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Brougham (340 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier. (120 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Brougham should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier.

Because 1967 Mercury Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Brougham (627 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 444 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier. (183 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Mercury Brougham 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier
Make Mercury Chevrolet
Model Brougham Cavalier
Year Released 1967 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6990 cc 2190 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 340 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 627 Nm 183 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Length 5560 mm 4600 mm
Vehicle Width 1990 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 3130 mm 2650 mm