1967 Mercury Brougham vs. 2000 Rover 45
To start off, 2000 Rover 45 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Brougham would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Brougham (340 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 2000 Rover 45. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Brougham should accelerate faster than 2000 Rover 45.
Because 1967 Mercury Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Rover 45, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Brougham (627 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 464 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Rover 45. (163 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Rover 45.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mercury Brougham | 2000 Rover 45 | |
Make | Mercury | Rover |
Model | Brougham | 45 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6990 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 627 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2630 mm |