1967 Mercury Brougham vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Brougham would be higher. At 6,721 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Brougham (325 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (245 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Brougham should accelerate faster than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Brougham (602 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Toyota Tundra. (427 Nm). This means 1967 Mercury Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Toyota Tundra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mercury Brougham | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Mercury | Toyota |
| Model | Brougham | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6721 cc | 4700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 602 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 3270 mm |
