1967 Mercury Brougham vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Brougham would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Brougham (340 HP) has 197 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Brougham should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2004 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mercury Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mercury Brougham | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mercury | Ford |
| Model | Brougham | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6990 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 340 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2490 mm |
