1967 Mercury Brougham vs. 2006 MG TF
To start off, 2006 MG TF is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Brougham would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Brougham (340 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 2006 MG TF. (159 HP @ 6900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Brougham should accelerate faster than 2006 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Brougham (627 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 453 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 MG TF. (174 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mercury Brougham | 2006 MG TF | |
Make | Mercury | MG |
Model | Brougham | TF |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 6990 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 159 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Torque | 627 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2380 mm |