1967 Mercury Brougham vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Brougham would be higher. At 6,721 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1967 Mercury Brougham. (325 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1967 Mercury Brougham.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Brougham (602 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden UTE. (530 Nm). This means 1967 Mercury Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mercury Brougham | 2008 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Mercury | Holden |
| Model | Brougham | UTE |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6721 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 325 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 602 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
