1967 Mercury Brougham vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Brougham would be higher. At 6,721 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Brougham (325 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2009 Holden UTE. (261 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Brougham should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Brougham (602 Nm) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden UTE. (340 Nm). This means 1967 Mercury Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mercury Brougham | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Mercury | Holden |
Model | Brougham | UTE |
Year Released | 1967 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6721 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 261 HP |
Torque | 602 Nm | 340 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |