1967 Mercury Brougham vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Brougham would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Brougham (340 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (200 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Brougham should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mercury Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Brougham (627 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Audi TT. (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mercury Brougham | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Mercury | Audi |
Model | Brougham | TT |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6990 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 627 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4178 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1351 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2469 mm |