1967 Mercury Brougham vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Brougham would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Brougham (340 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2010 Suzuki Equator. (261 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Brougham should accelerate faster than 2010 Suzuki Equator.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Brougham (627 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Suzuki Equator. (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Suzuki Equator.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mercury Brougham | 2010 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Mercury | Suzuki |
Model | Brougham | Equator |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6990 cc | 3954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 627 Nm | 381 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 5250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 3200 mm |