1967 Mercury Comet vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1967 Mercury Comet. (119 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mercury Comet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Comet weights approximately 960 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mercury Comet | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Mercury | Westfield |
| Model | Comet | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 3279 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2320 mm |
