1967 Mercury Comet vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2004 Nissan Armada is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1967 Mercury Comet. (119 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1967 Mercury Comet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 874 kg more than 1967 Mercury Comet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mercury Comet. (258 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mercury Comet.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mercury Comet | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Mercury | Nissan |
| Model | Comet | Armada |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3279 cc | 5556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 103 mm | 98.1 mm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2274 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3140 mm |
