1967 Mercury Comet vs. 2009 Suzuki Equator

To start off, 2009 Suzuki Equator is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Suzuki Equator (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1967 Mercury Comet. (119 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1967 Mercury Comet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Comet weights approximately 105 kg more than 2009 Suzuki Equator.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mercury Comet. (258 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mercury Comet.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Mercury Comet 2009 Suzuki Equator
Make Mercury Suzuki
Model Comet Equator
Year Released 1967 2009
Body Type Sedan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3279 cc 3954 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 119 HP 261 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 258 Nm 381 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1400 kg 1295 kg
Vehicle Length 5000 mm 5250 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 3200 mm