1967 Mercury Comet vs. 2010 Honda Civic
To start off, 2010 Honda Civic is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Civic (148 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1967 Mercury Comet. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1967 Mercury Comet.
Because 1967 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda Civic (350 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mercury Comet. (258 Nm). This means 2010 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mercury Comet.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mercury Comet | 2010 Honda Civic | |
Make | Mercury | Honda |
Model | Comet | Civic |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3279 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1785 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1460 mm |