1967 Mercury Cougar vs. 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada
To start off, 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada (158 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1967 Mercury Cougar. (137 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada should accelerate faster than 1967 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada weights approximately 390 kg more than 1967 Mercury Cougar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mercury Cougar | 1992 Oldsmobile Bravada | |
Make | Mercury | Oldsmobile |
Model | Cougar | Bravada |
Year Released | 1967 | 1992 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4940 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2720 mm |