1967 Mercury Cougar vs. 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee (225 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1967 Mercury Cougar. (137 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1967 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 248 kg more than 1967 Mercury Cougar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mercury Cougar | 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mercury | Jeep |
Model | Cougar | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1967 | 1993 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4940 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 225 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1648 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |