1967 Mercury Cougar vs. 2000 Honda Integra
To start off, 2000 Honda Integra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda Integra (176 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1967 Mercury Cougar. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1967 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 161 kg more than 2000 Honda Integra.
Because 1967 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mercury Cougar | 2000 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Mercury | Honda |
| Model | Cougar | Integra |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4727 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 176 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1199 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4525 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1325 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2620 mm |
