1967 Mercury Cougar vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mercury Cougar | 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie | |
Make | Mercury | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cougar | Nessie |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 137 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2790 mm |