1967 Mercury Cougar vs. 2005 Renault Megane

To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 7,003 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Cougar (217 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (113 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 24 kg more than 2005 Renault Megane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Cougar (432 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.

Compare all specifications: