1967 Mercury Cougar vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Cougar (129 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1967 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mercury Cougar | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mercury | Ford |
Model | Cougar | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1967 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4727 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2490 mm |