1967 Mercury Park Lane vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Park Lane would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Park Lane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (340 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Park Lane should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mercury Park Lane | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Mercury | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Park Lane | FTO |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6990 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 340 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2510 mm |
