1967 Mercury Park Lane vs. 1999 Nissan XVL

To start off, 1999 Nissan XVL is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Park Lane would be higher. At 6,722 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Park Lane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (325 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1999 Nissan XVL. (156 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Park Lane should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan XVL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Park Lane weights approximately 100 kg more than 1999 Nissan XVL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Mercury Park Lane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Park Lane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan XVL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (602 Nm) has 292 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Nissan XVL. (310 Nm). This means 1967 Mercury Park Lane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Nissan XVL.

Compare all specifications: