1967 Mercury Park Lane vs. 2002 Nissan Almera

To start off, 2002 Nissan Almera is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Park Lane would be higher. At 6,722 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Park Lane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (325 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 2002 Nissan Almera. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Park Lane should accelerate faster than 2002 Nissan Almera. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Park Lane weights approximately 170 kg more than 2002 Nissan Almera. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Mercury Park Lane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Park Lane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (602 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 472 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Nissan Almera. (130 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Park Lane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Nissan Almera.

Compare all specifications:

1967 Mercury Park Lane 2002 Nissan Almera
Make Mercury Nissan
Model Park Lane Almera
Year Released 1967 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6722 cc 1497 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 325 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 602 Nm 130 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1360 kg 1190 kg
Vehicle Length 5560 mm 4190 mm
Vehicle Width 1990 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 3130 mm 2540 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]