1967 Mercury Park Lane vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Park Lane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Park Lane would be higher. At 6,990 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Park Lane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (340 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (158 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Park Lane should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 110 kg more than 1967 Mercury Park Lane.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Park Lane (626 Nm) has 406 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm). This means 1967 Mercury Park Lane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mercury Park Lane | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Mercury | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Park Lane | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6990 cc | 2343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 340 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 626 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2630 mm |
