1967 MG 1100 vs. 2002 Pontiac Grand Am
To start off, 2002 Pontiac Grand Am is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 MG 1100 would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Pontiac Grand Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Pontiac Grand Am (176 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1967 MG 1100. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Pontiac Grand Am should accelerate faster than 1967 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Pontiac Grand Am weights approximately 566 kg more than 1967 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Pontiac Grand Am (278 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 MG 1100. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Pontiac Grand Am will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1967 MG 1100 | 2002 Pontiac Grand Am | |
Make | MG | Pontiac |
Model | 1100 | Grand Am |
Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 3350 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 278 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2750 mm |