1967 MG 1100 vs. 2002 Toyota Solara
To start off, 2002 Toyota Solara is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,438 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Solara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Solara (162 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1967 MG 1100. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Solara should accelerate faster than 1967 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Solara weights approximately 555 kg more than 1967 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Solara (224 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 MG 1100. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Toyota Solara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1967 MG 1100 | 2002 Toyota Solara | |
Make | MG | Toyota |
Model | 1100 | Solara |
Year Released | 1967 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2438 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2680 mm |