1967 MG MGC vs. 2003 MG ZR
To start off, 2003 MG ZR is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2003 MG ZR. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2003 MG ZR.
Because 1967 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MG ZR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 MG MGC (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZR. (123 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1967 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZR.
Compare all specifications:
1967 MG MGC | 2003 MG ZR | |
Make | MG | MG |
Model | MGC | ZR |
Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2510 mm |