1967 MG MGC vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (113 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor.
Because 2003 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 MG MGC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Condor (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 MG MGC | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | MG | Toyota |
| Model | MGC | Condor |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2358 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 113 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2520 mm |
