1967 MG MGC vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (74 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio.
Because 1967 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 MG MGC (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1967 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1967 MG MGC | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | MG | Renault |
Model | MGC | Clio |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2630 mm |