1967 Mini MK I vs. 2008 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2008 Toyota Camry is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Camry weights approximately 749 kg more than 1967 Mini MK I.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Camry (187 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mini MK I | 2008 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Mini | Toyota |
Model | MK I | Camry |
Year Released | 1967 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 60 Nm | 187 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 615 kg | 1364 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2680 mm |