1967 Mini MK II vs. 1986 Reliant SE6

To start off, 1986 Reliant SE6 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mini MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mini MK II would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Reliant SE6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Reliant SE6 (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1967 Mini MK II. (53 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Reliant SE6 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mini MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Reliant SE6 weights approximately 600 kg more than 1967 Mini MK II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1986 Reliant SE6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Reliant SE6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Mini MK II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Reliant SE6 (233 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mini MK II. (77 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Reliant SE6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mini MK II.

Compare all specifications: