1967 Mini MK II vs. 2005 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2005 Toyota RunX is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mini MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mini MK II would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota RunX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota RunX (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1967 Mini MK II. (53 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota RunX should accelerate faster than 1967 Mini MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota RunX weights approximately 472 kg more than 1967 Mini MK II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota RunX (147 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mini MK II. (77 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Toyota RunX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mini MK II.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mini MK II | 2005 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Mini | Toyota |
Model | MK II | RunX |
Year Released | 1967 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 77 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1122 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2560 mm |