1967 Mini MK II vs. 2010 Volvo C70
To start off, 2010 Volvo C70 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mini MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mini MK II would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C70 weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1967 Mini MK II.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C70 (350 Nm) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mini MK II. (77 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mini MK II. 2010 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 1967 Mini MK II has manual transmission. 1967 Mini MK II will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Mini MK II | 2010 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Mini | Volvo |
| Model | MK II | C70 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 77 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4582 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2639 mm |
