1967 Mitsubishi 500 vs. 2011 Ford F-250
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mitsubishi 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mitsubishi 500 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 362 more horse power than 1967 Mitsubishi 500. (23 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mitsubishi 500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 514 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mitsubishi 500. (34 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mitsubishi 500.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Mitsubishi 500 | 2011 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | 500 | F-250 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 594 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 23 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 34 Nm | 548 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2070 mm | 3967 mm |