1967 Morris 1800 vs. 2010 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Morris 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Morris 1800 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Falcon (387 HP) has 308 more horse power than 1967 Morris 1800. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1967 Morris 1800.
Because 2010 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Morris 1800, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Falcon (520 Nm) has 384 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Morris 1800. (136 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Morris 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Morris 1800 | 2010 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Morris | Ford |
Model | 1800 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 387 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 520 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 68 L |