1967 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1959 Saab 95
To start off, 1967 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Saab 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Saab 95 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 20 kg more than 1959 Saab 95.
Because 1967 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Saab 95, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Nissan Bluebird | 1959 Saab 95 | |
Make | Nissan | Saab |
Model | Bluebird | 95 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 841 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 37 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2500 mm |