1967 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1981 Honda Accord
To start off, 1981 Honda Accord is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,602 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Honda Accord is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 40 kg more than 1981 Honda Accord.
Because 1967 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Nissan Bluebird | 1981 Honda Accord | |
Make | Nissan | Honda |
Model | Bluebird | Accord |
Year Released | 1967 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1602 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2390 mm |