1967 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Nissan Bluebird (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 156 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Bluebird (103 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (78 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Nissan Bluebird | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Nissan | Zastava |
Model | Bluebird | 102 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1115 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 78 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 906 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2160 mm |