1967 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1996 Honda CR-V is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda CR-V weights approximately 570 kg more than 1967 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1996 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Bluebird | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Nissan | Honda |
| Model | Bluebird | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2620 mm |
