1967 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2000 Honda Passport
To start off, 2000 Honda Passport is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Honda Passport is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda Passport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Nissan Bluebird | 2000 Honda Passport | |
Make | Nissan | Honda |
Model | Bluebird | Passport |
Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 3201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2710 mm |