1967 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 1036 kg more than 1967 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1967 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Nissan | Mazda |
| Model | Bluebird | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5075 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2875 mm |
