1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 1965 Trabant Universal
To start off, 1967 Nissan Cedric is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Trabant Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Trabant Universal would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Nissan Cedric (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1965 Trabant Universal. (23 HP @ 3900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1965 Trabant Universal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 660 kg more than 1965 Trabant Universal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Trabant Universal. (51 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Trabant Universal.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 1965 Trabant Universal | |
| Make | Nissan | Trabant |
| Model | Cedric | Universal |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2164 cc | 595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 23 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 51 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2030 mm |
