1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 1968 Volvo 145
To start off, 1968 Volvo 145 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 145. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 145.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 145. (153 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 145.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Nissan Cedric | 1968 Volvo 145 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Cedric | 145 |
Year Released | 1967 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2620 mm |