1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 1983 Toyota Camry
To start off, 1983 Toyota Camry is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Camry. (89 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1967 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Camry. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 210 kg more than 1983 Toyota Camry. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Camry. (143 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 1983 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Cedric | Camry |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1832 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 143 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |
