1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 1988 Volvo 760
To start off, 1988 Volvo 760 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Volvo 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Volvo 760 (165 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Volvo 760 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Volvo 760 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1988 Volvo 760 (240 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1988 Volvo 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 1988 Volvo 760 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Cedric | 760 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2164 cc | 2849 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1335 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2780 mm |
