1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 1997 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 1997 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,980 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Toyota 4Runner (123 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 530 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Toyota 4Runner (295 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1997 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Nissan Cedric | 1997 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Cedric | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1967 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2164 cc | 2980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 295 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |