1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 1999 Suzuki Baleno
To start off, 1999 Suzuki Baleno is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Suzuki Baleno (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Suzuki Baleno should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 426 kg more than 1999 Suzuki Baleno.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Suzuki Baleno. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Suzuki Baleno.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 1999 Suzuki Baleno | |
| Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
| Model | Cedric | Baleno |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2164 cc | 1298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 894 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2390 mm |
