1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 1999 Toyota MR2
To start off, 1999 Toyota MR2 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Toyota MR2 (140 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 350 kg more than 1999 Toyota MR2.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Toyota MR2 (183 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1999 Toyota MR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1967 Nissan Cedric | 1999 Toyota MR2 | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Cedric | MR2 |
| Year Released | 1967 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 183 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2440 mm |
