1967 Nissan Cedric vs. 2000 Volvo S60
To start off, 2000 Volvo S60 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Volvo S60 (246 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo S60 weights approximately 156 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Volvo S60 (330 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2000 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1967 Nissan Cedric | 2000 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Cedric | S60 |
Year Released | 1967 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2164 cc | 2319 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 246 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2800 mm |